mhra-ai-2026-09-08
declined by analysis OSCILLATION — the before-hash returns; the publisher serves two variants
What the bytes were of
Evidence
Mechanical change class
The class of the difference between the two retained texts. It describes what moved. It does not appraise the change, and there is no ordering between the four classes; a candidate may hold several. It is a different field from the detection class above, which is read from the observation records rather than from the two texts.
No class could be derived: all 1 differing span are markup attribute residue retained by a superseded tag matcher, not document text.
Derived over 1 differing span: 1 excluded as markup attribute residue, 0 eligible. The classification reports classes and counts and never the changed text itself: reproducing a publisher’s words is quotation, and this page is not a quoting surface.
What the confirm gate read
The gate was not run. A rule resolved this candidate, and a confirm and a decline are contradictory verdicts about one candidate, so no confirm is computed where a rule has already answered.
What was decided
OSCILLATION — the before-hash returns; the publisher serves two variants
Decided by analysis, not by a person on 2026-09-12. A machine verdict is a distinct state: it is never displayed or counted as human-verified, and it can be upgraded by a person.
machine verdict, batch b47c8d3f3312, 2026-09-12. ATTRIBUTE RESIDUE (windowed): all 1 remaining span(s) sit inside attribute text the corrected tag matcher removes; raw body not retained, so this is a windowed read and not a re-normalisation
Quoted from the receipt that recorded the act. Any timestamp in it is reduced to the day it names, because this record publishes days and not times; the full value is in the confirmation ledger.
A candidate is a pair of digests that differ, and nothing more. This page reports what differed, where the bytes came from, and which rule was applied. It does not say what any change means.
Last updated: