pending human review SURVIVES — not oscillation, document-class, delta is neither excluded furniture nor attribute residue
No receipt records a decision on this candidate. The confirm gate ran and
reached no confirmation, so what is short here is evidence rather than a
reading; what would settle it is named below.
The class of the difference between the two retained texts. It
describes what moved. It does not appraise the change, and there
is no ordering between the four classes; a candidate may hold several. It is a different field from the detection class above, which
is read from the observation records rather than from the two texts.
CONTENT
after that same fold, at least one word of two or more letters is present on one side and not on the other, and it is not a web address, a month name, a version keyword or a status word.
Derived over 10 differing
spans:
8 excluded as markup attribute residue,
2 eligible, of which 1 matched none of the four rules. The classification reports classes and counts and never the changed
text itself: reproducing a publisher’s words is quotation, and this
page is not a quoting surface.
What the confirm gate read
At least one element did not pass, so no confirmation is reached. What would settle each is named beside it.
referent — pass
both hashes answered at https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-211, which is the address the row publishes.
identity — unmeasured
no declared marker for this row.
Would settle it: a declared document referent for this row — the marker the document uses for itself, with its evidence.
class — pass
classed document then document.
transport — pass
200 on both sides by direct.
window — pass
2026-09-07 to 2026-09-08.
delta — unmeasured
the published exclusions fired ['ecfr-title-amended-banner'] on the before text and [] on the after text, so the two were not reduced by the same rules.
Would settle it: a pair on which the same exclusions fire, or a re-reading of both texts under one version of the list.
witness — unmeasured
the two texts were not reduced by the same exclusions, so a token new to one of them may be an artifact of the reduction.
Would settle it: a pair on which the same exclusions fire.
What was decided
SURVIVES — not oscillation, document-class, delta is neither excluded furniture nor attribute residue
Decided by nobody yet .
A candidate is a pair of digests that differ, and nothing more. This page
reports what differed, where the bytes came from, and which rule was applied.
It does not say what any change means.