GxPlex

Corrections

Every correction made to a published factual claim, with its date. Factual claims are never silently edited.

A tracker whose past statements can change without record cannot be cited: a reader who quoted it last month has no way to know whether the quotation still stands. Corrections are therefore additive and permanent.

Corrections, most recent first
DateSubject CorrectionSource
eu-digital-omnibus-ai correction: this entry publishes a status date of 2024-08-01 whose banked evidence names Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — a different act. Borrowed authority, person-verified. was “status_as_of 2024-08-01, person-verified 2026-08-04” → “withdrawn as a claim about Regulation (EU) 2026/1744; the field awaits a keypress” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
correction: `topics` held this record's own authored vocabulary, an API field since 2026-07-27 and a page tree since 2026-09-09. 77 of its 96 identifiers had no publisher-stated twin. Retired. was “`topics`: this record's own vocabulary, typed per entry, cited nowhere — 96 identifiers” → “`topics`: derived by rule from each entry's own subject_as_stated — 24 identifiers, every value a publisher states” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
correction: from 2026-09-12 to 2026-09-18 the front line took one figure from the run ledger and the rest from the observation store, so a nightly build named two nights in one sentence. Repaired. was “not-retrieved from the run ledger's last row; digests-moved from the observation store” → “every front-line figure from the observation store, for the night the sentence names” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
correction: 131 row pages marked an unchanged run of digests `stable`, while this record's own vocabulary page says a run of unchanged digests is not a statement that a document is stable. was “a window with no digest change is marked `stable`” → “a window with no digest change is marked `unchanged`” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
correction: the front page offered one candidate as a change to a document while the keystroke door refused it. The door was right; the row hashes a hub page. Withdrawn. was “1 offered as a change to a document, 1 as a change to a page about one” → “0 offered as a change to a document, 0 as a change to a page about one” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
coverage (every document on this axis) correction: five rows have hashed a page about their document, not the document, for their whole series. The address each actually reads is named here. was “five rows whose digests were held as readings of the document they name” → “five rows whose digests are of the publisher's page ABOUT that document, stated on each” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
health-canada-ml correction: this row names a machine-learning guidance document and its digests are of Health Canada's medical-devices hub page, which carries 77 dated list entries. was “a row declaring a guidance document and reading Health Canada's medical-devices hub” → “the same reading, stated as what it is: a hub page carrying a dated list” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
coverage (every document on this axis) correction: 762 ich.org records answered HTTP 200 and contained no document. They were held as observations; they are now classed as responses that were not the artifact. was “913 ich.org records held as a series of readings” → “25 readings, 762 responses that were not the document, 126 transport failures” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
status (every document on this axis) correction: the 55 status-log entries record this record's own status field moving, not a publisher moving a document's status. None is a movement observed between two readings. was “55 entries published as changes to documents' statuses” → “55 entries published as this record's own status field moving, with the publisher's passage shown beside each” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-ai-guidance correction: this entry's document-series count leaves out 2 records that landed on a not-found page, and no page said so. Nothing is rewritten; both are now stated as held and excluded. link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-csa correction: this entry's document-series count leaves 28 records out, and no page said so or on whose word. Nothing is rewritten; the 28 are now stated as held and excluded. link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-device-cybersecurity-2026 correction: this entry's document-series count leaves 24 records out, every one of them hashed, and no page said so. Nothing is rewritten; they are now stated as held and excluded. link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
correction: the published '43 detected candidates' figure was computed against the pages these rows hashed, not the documents they name. Withdrawn; the method is repaired and the re-screen published. was “43 detected change candidates” → “43 re-screened: 21 chrome, 16 oscillation, 3 attribute residue, 1 witness, 1 listing, 1 survivor” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-device-cybersecurity correction: this row's status is superseded and its document series is ended. Every observation it made was of the successor document; the successor row holds the one series. was “unknown” → “superseded” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
astm-e2363 correction: this row declared an address its series has never answered at. The row now records the answered URL and keeps the prior one. Series continuous — same document, no splice. was “https://www.astm.org/e2363-23.html” → “https://store.astm.org/e2363-23.html” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
astm-e2500 correction: this row declared an address its series has never answered at. The row now records the answered URL and keeps the prior one. Series continuous — same document, no splice. was “https://www.astm.org/e2500-25.html” → “https://store.astm.org/e2500-25.html” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ema-ai-reflection correction: this row declared an address its series has never answered at. The row now records the answered URL and keeps the prior one. Series continuous — same document, no splice. was “https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/use-artificial-intelligence-ai-medicinal-product-lifecycle” → “https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/use-artificial-intelligence-ai-medicinal-product-lifecycle-scientific-guideline” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-gmp-annex-21 correction: this row declared an address its series has never answered at. The row now records the answered URL and keeps the prior one. Series continuous — same document, no splice. was “https://ec.europa.eu/health/document/download/e2ddfe65-7b4e-4765-b71b-4681772d2949_en” → “https://health.ec.europa.eu/document/download/e2ddfe65-7b4e-4765-b71b-4681772d2949_en” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-aiml-device-list correction: this row declared an address its series has never answered at. The row now records the answered URL and keeps the prior one. Series continuous — same document, no splice. was “https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-aiml-enabl” → “https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-enabled-medical-devices” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
us-21-cfr-part-11 correction: this row declared an address its series has never answered at. The row now records the answered URL and keeps the prior one. Series continuous — same document, no splice. was “https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/part-11” → “https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-11” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-ai-guidance correction: this row's resolved_url named a page ABOUT the document. It now names the document, derived from that page's own designator-labeled link. The witness series is unchanged. was “https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/considerations-use-artificial-intelligence-supp” → “https://www.fda.gov/media/184830/download” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ich-q12 correction: this row's resolved_url named a page ABOUT the document. It now names the document, derived from that page's own designator-labeled link. The witness series is unchanged. was “https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/q12-technical-and-regulatory-considerations-pha” → “https://www.fda.gov/media/148476/download” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ich-q13 correction: this row's resolved_url named a page ABOUT the document. It now names the document, derived from that page's own designator-labeled link. The witness series is unchanged. was “https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/q13-continuous-manufacturing-drug-substances-an” → “https://www.fda.gov/media/165775/download” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ich-q14 correction: this row's resolved_url named a page ABOUT the document. It now names the document, derived from that page's own designator-labeled link. The witness series is unchanged. was “https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ich-q14-analytical-procedure-development-scientific-guideline” → “https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-q14-guideline-analytical-procedure-development-step-5-re” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ich-q2r2 correction: this row's resolved_url named a page ABOUT the document. It now names the document, derived from that page's own designator-labeled link. The witness series is unchanged. was “https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ich-q2r2-validation-analytical-procedures-scientific-guideline” → “https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-q2r2-guideline-validation-analytical-procedures-step-5-r” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ich-q9r1 correction: this row's resolved_url named a page ABOUT the document. It now names the document, derived from that page's own designator-labeled link. The witness series is unchanged. was “https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ich-q9-quality-risk-management-scientific-guideline” → “https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/international-conference-harmonisation-technical-requirement” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
correction: text_retained was derived from the row's resolution_strategy, not measured. 31 rows published it true while holding cleaned PDF file bytes, not text. Now measured from the store. was “121 rows publish text_retained: true” → “90 rows publish text_retained: true” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
correction: 47 rows carried tier 1 without appearing in the declared list, the approved canon or a documented exception. Reassigned to tier 2 in one act; the membership rule is now published. was “87 rows assigned tier 1” → “55 rows assigned tier 1” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-ai-guidance correction: the corroboration count counted kinds of surface, not surfaces. This row has three distinct publisher addresses stating its status and reported one. was “corroboration_count 1” → “corroboration_count 3” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-gmp-annex-15 correction: this row's summary made a scope claim in this site's own voice with no citation. It now reports the publisher's own title instead. was “a summary asserting scope in this site's own voice” → “a summary reporting the European Commission's own published title” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-mdr correction: this row's summary made a scope claim in this site's own voice with no citation. It now reports the publisher's own title instead. was “a summary asserting scope in this site's own voice” → “a summary reporting the act's own published title” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
iso-iec-27017 correction: this row's summary made a scope claim in this site's own voice with no citation. It now reports the publisher's own title instead. was “a summary asserting scope and a relation to two other standards” → “a summary reporting the published title and this row's licence limit” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
astm-e2363 correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 50-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 7-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
astm-e2500 correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 50-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 7-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ema-ai-reflection correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 33-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 12-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ema-ct-computerised-systems correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 48-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 10-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ema-data-quality-framework correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 46-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 6-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ema-work-programme correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap and no compliant span exists in the banked evidence, so none is published. Withheld rather than shortened. was “a 49-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “no quotation published; the reason is stated on the row” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-ai-act correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap and no compliant span exists in the banked evidence, so none is published. Withheld rather than shortened. was “a 52-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “no quotation published; the reason is stated on the row” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-cyber-resilience-act correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 42-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 11-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-cybersecurity-act correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 36-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 11-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-digital-omnibus-ai correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 33-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 4-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-gmp-annex-11 correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 34-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 8-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-ivdr correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap and no compliant span exists in the banked evidence, so none is published. Withheld rather than shortened. was “a 51-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “no quotation published; the reason is stated on the row” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-machinery-regulation correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 36-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 11-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-mdr correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap and no compliant span exists in the banked evidence, so none is published. Withheld rather than shortened. was “a 49-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “no quotation published; the reason is stated on the row” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-nis2 correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 47-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 11-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-csa correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap and no compliant span exists in the banked evidence, so none is published. Withheld rather than shortened. was “a 27-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “no quotation published; the reason is stated on the row” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ich-e6r3 correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap and no compliant span exists in the banked evidence, so none is published. Withheld rather than shortened. was “a 46-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “no quotation published; the reason is stated on the row” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ich-q2r2 correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 26-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 11-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ieee-7000 correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 25-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 12-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
iso-iec-22989 correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 24-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 6-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
iso-iec-23894 correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 25-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 6-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
iso-iec-42001 correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 46-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 6-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
mhra-ai correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 15-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 10-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
nist-sp-800-82 correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap. A shorter span was SELECTED from the same banked evidence, not trimmed. The evidence record is unchanged. was “a 30-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “a 6-word verbatim sub-span of the same banked evidence” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
pics-pi041 correction: the quotation here exceeded the 14-word cap and no compliant span exists in the banked evidence, so none is published. Withheld rather than shortened. was “a 20-word quotation, over the 14-word cap” → “no quotation published; the reason is stated on the row” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-ai-act correction: 2 August 2028 sat in status_as_of, the day a status is stated as of, so the page dated a present status two years ahead. It has moved to effective_date. The status itself is unchanged. was “status_as_of: 2028-08-02 · effective_date: null” → “status_as_of: null · effective_date: 2028-08-02” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-csa correction: this row's account said fda.gov drops automated clients and that its status awaited a person. Both were false when the sentence was written. The account is withheld, not rewritten. was “fda.gov drops automated clients, so the guidance page cannot be read directly. The Federal Register records its issuance on 24 September 2025; that date is evidence and is waiting on a person to confirm the status it implies.” → “no account. The field is withheld: the row resolves to a document, hashes it, and its status carries a recorded human confirmation, so there is nothing unresolved for it to account for.” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
status-unknown (every document on this axis) correction: the four shares of `unknown` were published on one built page, far from the number they decompose, and the fourth rendered only above zero. All four now print under the chip they sum to. was “(the four shares of `unknown` on 1 built page of 722, below the ten reasons, with the fourth member rendered only above zero)” → “All four shares print under the active `unknown` chip, on every built page where `unknown` is the selected status, summing to the number that chip shows.” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
record-tier (every document on this axis) correction: tier sentences stated what had happened to an entry and were false for part of each tier. They now state only what the label undertakes; a duplicate register note carrying one was cut. was “This entry is retrieved and hashed every night, and its status is one a person is asked to confirm.” → “Filed core. For that label this archive undertakes to put an entry's status to a person.” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
verification (every document on this axis) correction: the homepage said all 44 frozen entries have no public document to verify against. 38 of 44 record another reason. The five reasons the rows record now render, and /limits lists each. was “no public document exists to verify them against, and each states which” → “the reason each one records is: 23 paywalled — progression tracked; 9 listing only; 6 not a document; 3 blocks automated requests; 3 register states no status” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
status (every document on this axis) correction: the tracker's Status column carried the document's status and this record's verification mark under one header, on 132 of 132 rows. Each axis now has its own column. was “one Status column over the document's status and this record's verification mark” → “Status and Verification as separate columns, each sorted by the axis it shows” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-ai-guidance correction: this entry hashes FDA's guidance search index, not the guidance. It now carries an account saying so, and saying that its two recorded text changes are one excursion and its return. was “no account — a digest rendered under the guidance's title with nothing to place it” → “an account naming what the series hashes, and what the two recorded text changes were” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-device-cybersecurity-2026 correction: this entry's account said no status had been confirmed by a keypress while the entry published final. The status is act-backed; the account was the stale half and is rewritten. was “an account ending 'the value stays unknown', rendered two sentences from a published status of final” → “an account naming the act the status traces to, and recording that the earlier sentence was stale” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-device-cybersecurity correction: this entry hashes the February 2026 successor's page, not its own. It now carries an account of what it tracks; the referent question stays open and is not settled here. was “no account — the successor's digest rendered under the June 2025 edition's title” → “an account naming what the series hashes and recording that the referent question stays open” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
nmpa-ai correction: the account said one identical hash across 95 observations while the same page counted 109 and one change. The store holds 109 records and 2 digests, the second from 2026-08-21. was “an account reading 'one identical hash across all 95 observations', one screen above a generated block reading '109 observation(s) recorded' and '1 change(s)'” → “an account stating 109 records and two digests, naming the same population the generated block counts, dating its figures, and recording the second digest as first observed 2026-08-21” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
status-unknown (every document on this axis) correction: five rows carried a publisher-share reason typed from a 404 or 403 returned to an address this archive constructed. Those codes no longer type a reason; no observation changed. was “the address returns not-found: 3 · the request was refused: 2” → “the address returns not-found: 0 · the request was refused: 0” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-gmp-annex-14 correction: the status moved unknown to in-force at commit 02a18d2d on 2026-08-24 and no changelog entry was written at the time. Recorded 2026-09-01 from git history. was “unknown” → “in-force” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
record-tier (every document on this axis) correction: the tier labels no longer carry a claim the holdings contradict; each entry now states its promise in words was “register-observed” → “register” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
status-unknown (every document on this axis) correction: 40 rows moved from 'not yet read' to 'unmeasured with cause' — a reading error, not a data change was “not yet read: 66” → “not yet read: 26” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-gmp-annex-17 correction: the status moved unknown to in-force at commit cb52e496 on 2026-08-16 and no changelog entry was written at the time. Recorded 2026-09-01 from git history. was “unknown” → “in-force” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-device-cybersecurity-2026 correction: an entry's title and its evidence never referred to the same document. 232 observation records, including all 24 content hashes, are re-scoped to the February 2026 edition. link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
imdrf-aiml-wg correction: a body record asserted a kind no retrieved source states was “recorded in two collections under one id” → “one id, one record — the instrument row” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ema-ct-computerised-systems correction: the status moved unknown to final at commit 237b4a5b on 2026-08-01 and no changelog entry was written at the time. Recorded 2026-09-01 from git history. was “unknown” → “final” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-gmp-annex-22 correction: observations dated 28-30 July hashed a different document was “797a882ba0eafe08c329001260e2dabf7c05db82f8a5766d7f75df7569f2e85d” → “07dc6a9975d123f2aa8ca9a2c0d5ba28b09b743d847d136814b6dfa555531a26” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-gmp-annex-11 correction: status withdrawn — the source is the EudraLex Volume 4 index, which cannot state one document's status link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-gmp-annex-22 correction: status withdrawn — the source is the EudraLex Volume 4 index, which cannot state one document's status link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-ai-guidance correction: status withdrawn — the Federal Register announces this guidance as a draft link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-ai-guidance correction — `final` was read from FDA's search-page help text; the entry also pointed at the search page rather than at the guidance was “final” → “unknown” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-cdrh-aiml correction: the status moved unknown to draft at commit 9c0a7368 on 2026-07-30 and no changelog entry was written at the time. Recorded 2026-09-01 from git history. was “unknown” → “draft” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-csa correction: the status moved unknown to final at commit 0d8fe64c on 2026-07-30 and no changelog entry was written at the time. Recorded 2026-09-01 from git history. was “unknown” → “final” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-guidance-agenda correction — `draft` was read from a sentence about the guidances the agenda lists, not about the agenda; an agenda has no status was “draft” → “unknown” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ich-q2r2 correction: status withdrawn — the source is the ICH quality-guidelines index, shared with eight other entries link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ieee-7000 correction: status withdrawn — the page states "active standard" three times, including in a labelled Status field link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
nist-ai-rmf correction: status withdrawn — every occurrence of "draft" on the page describes a PRIOR version, under a heading reading "prior documents" link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
pic-s correction: status withdrawn — the source is the PIC/S publications listing, which cannot state one document's status link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
pics-pi041 correction: status withdrawn — the source is the PIC/S publications listing, which cannot state one document's status link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
astm-e2363 correction: source URL repointed at the edition the publisher marks current was “https://www.astm.org/e2363-14.html” → “https://www.astm.org/e2363-23.html” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
astm-e2500 correction: source URL repointed at the edition the publisher marks current was “https://www.astm.org/e2500-20.html” → “https://www.astm.org/e2500-25.html” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
cen-jtc21-programme correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-gmp-annex-11 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
eu-gmp-annex-22 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-cdrh-aiml correction: primary source URL no longer resolves was “resolving” → “error page” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-csa correction: primary source URL no longer resolves was “resolving” → “error page” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
fda-guidance-agenda correction: primary source URL no longer resolves was “resolving” → “error page” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ich-q12 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ich-q13 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ich-q14 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ich-q2r2 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
ich-q9r1 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
iso-iec-22989 correction: the status moved unknown to final at commit 249742e9 on 2026-07-29 and no changelog entry was written at the time. Recorded 2026-09-01 from git history. was “unknown” → “final” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
iso-iec-24028 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
iso-iec-38507 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
iso-iec-42005 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
iso-iec-5259 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
iso-iec-sc42-programme correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
mhra-ai-airlock correction: primary source URL no longer resolves was “resolving” → “error page” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
mhra-ai correction: primary source URL no longer resolves was “resolving” → “error page” link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
pic-s correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
pics-pi041 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
pren-18229-1 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
pren-18229-2 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
pren-18281 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved
pren-18282 correction: status_as_of removed — the date belonged to a shared index page link (opens in new tab) · retrieved

This page carries every correction to a published claim about a tracked document, or about one of the axes this record publishes over all of them. Corrections to this record’s own machinery — counting rules, page templates, figures, quoted spans — are kept in the repository history instead, because they change nothing this site has said about any document.

Reporting an error

corrections@gxplex.com — please include the page and the primary source that contradicts it. No form, no tracking, no third party.

Last updated: